{"id":31257,"date":"2024-11-29T12:41:17","date_gmt":"2024-11-29T19:41:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/?post_type=library&#038;p=31257"},"modified":"2024-11-29T12:41:17","modified_gmt":"2024-11-29T19:41:17","slug":"the-quotidian-rule-of-law","status":"publish","type":"library","link":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/library\/the-quotidian-rule-of-law\/","title":{"rendered":"The Quotidian Rule of Law"},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The rule of law is often linked, at least in the minds of its most fervent advocates, with a desire or nostalgia for \u201cnormal\u201d life. Typically, the focus is on regularity or norm-following in the context of executive or administrative decision-making. In this paper, though, I focus on a somewhat different dimension of the rule of law and its relationship to everyday life; i.e., the ways in which legislation can offend or be in tension with rule-of-law values, not by virtue of its authorization of vast discretionary powers or its incompatibility with individual rights, but simply by virtue of its potential disruptiveness to established social norms, customs, practices, etc. Though the law undoubtedly can and sometimes should be used to change social norms and practices, and not merely to reinforce them, it does not follow that law-makers should treat the existence of norms, customs, institutions, etc. as irrelevant or unimportant. On the contrary, as the work of Lon Fuller shows, the latter may have a profound effect on what legislators, practically speaking, can do, and how they can use the law effectively.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"template":"","library--year":[108],"law-and-freedom":[],"library-theme":[88],"dicey-law-review":[78],"main-categories":[67],"class_list":["post-31257","library","type-library","status-publish","hentry","library--year-108","library-theme-rule-of-law","dicey-law-review-volume-2","main-categories-dicey-law-review"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library\/31257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/library"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library\/31257\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"library--year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library--year?post=31257"},{"taxonomy":"law-and-freedom","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/law-and-freedom?post=31257"},{"taxonomy":"library-theme","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library-theme?post=31257"},{"taxonomy":"dicey-law-review","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/dicey-law-review?post=31257"},{"taxonomy":"main-categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/main-categories?post=31257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}