{"id":31255,"date":"2024-11-29T12:36:39","date_gmt":"2024-11-29T19:36:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/?post_type=library&#038;p=31255"},"modified":"2024-11-29T12:36:39","modified_gmt":"2024-11-29T19:36:39","slug":"justice-scalias-impact-on-canadian-jurisprudence","status":"publish","type":"library","link":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/library\/justice-scalias-impact-on-canadian-jurisprudence\/","title":{"rendered":"Justice Scalia\u2019s Impact on Canadian Jurisprudence"},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Few scholars have focused on the transnational influence of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. At first glance, his twin approaches of textualism and originalism seem distinctly un-Canadian. For example, the dominant mode of Canadian constitutional interpretation \u2014 living tree constitutionalism \u2014 seemingly represents the diametric opposite of originalism. Yet this article argues that Justice Scalia has shaped Canadian jurisprudence, not only in terms of how frequently Canadian judges cite to his work, but also in terms of his indirect influence on Canadian constitutional and statutory interpretation.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"template":"","library--year":[108],"law-and-freedom":[],"library-theme":[134],"dicey-law-review":[78],"main-categories":[67],"class_list":["post-31255","library","type-library","status-publish","hentry","library--year-108","library-theme-originalism","dicey-law-review-volume-2","main-categories-dicey-law-review"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library\/31255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/library"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library\/31255\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"library--year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library--year?post=31255"},{"taxonomy":"law-and-freedom","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/law-and-freedom?post=31255"},{"taxonomy":"library-theme","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/library-theme?post=31255"},{"taxonomy":"dicey-law-review","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/dicey-law-review?post=31255"},{"taxonomy":"main-categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/runnymedesociety.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/main-categories?post=31255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}