Exposing a Bad Trick: Why Quebec’s Bill 96 Cannot Amend the Canadian Constitution

Section 159 of Bill 96, An Act respecting French, the offıcial and common language of Québec, purports to amend the Constitution Act, 1867, and therefore the Canadian Constitution, by introducing two new articles, “90Q.1” and 90Q.2”, respectively, providing that “Quebecers form a nation” and that “French is the only offıcial...

The Quotidian Rule of Law

The rule of law is often linked, at least in the minds of its most fervent advocates, with a desire or nostalgia for “normal” life. Typically, the focus is on regularity or norm-following in the context of executive or administrative decision-making. In this paper, though, I focus on a somewhat...

Justice Scalia’s Impact on Canadian Jurisprudence

Few scholars have focused on the transnational influence of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. At first glance, his twin approaches of textualism and originalism seem distinctly un-Canadian. For example, the dominant mode of Canadian constitutional interpretation — living tree constitutionalism — seemingly represents the diametric opposite of originalism. Yet...

Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of the Common Good

In this article, I wade into the debate between textualism and “common good” methods of interpretation. I argue that, except for those advocating the most extreme version of each position, the debate is a narrow one about the utilization of purpose in the interpretation of legal text. Most textualists already...

Henry VIII Clauses and the Constitution Stephen Armstrong

Sections 91 and 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 reveal a formula for a governmental structure designed to protect individual liberty. These sections assign the authority to “make Laws” exclusively to legislatures. The separation of legislative power from executive power and the vestiture of legislative power in a representative institution...

en_CAEnglish (Canada)