Un forum juridique pour la diversité intellectuelle

Does the Notwithstanding clause turn off rights protected by the Charter? Does it preserve those rights by requiring courts to stay silent while legislatures alone interpret their bounds? Or are courts always available to provide a remedy? This episode features political science professor Geoffrey Sigalet and lawyer Eric Mendelsohn. For further reading, take a look at the following articles: Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn & Robert Leckey  “The faulty received wisdom around the notwithstanding clause” (Policy Options, 2019) Maxime St-Hilaire and Xavier

Is free speech protected in Canada? Christine Van Geyn, Litigation Director, and Josh Dehaas, Counsel, for the Canadian Constitution Foundation join us to talk about their latest book, “Free Speech in Canada.” The book provides a history of this important right and how it has evolved. This episode features guest host Sam Benzaquen, Vice President of the Runnymede Society’s student chapter at McGill University.

How can legal professionals better understand the meaning of the Canadian constitution? MP Scott Reid and Michael J. Scott discuss Primary Documents, “a searchable database of historical documents relating to the drafting and adoption of the Constitution of Canada.” Their work aims to facilitate legal research and provide a better understanding of Canada’s constitutional law and history. For more information, take a look at their website, primarydocuments.ca.

Did Canada breach its constitutional agreement with Alberta, prompting the creation of the Alberta Sovereignty Act? Professor Geoffrey Sigalet from the University of British Columbia and Jesse Hartery, Ph.D. candidate at Melbourne Law School, discuss the Alberta Sovereignty Act. This episode features guest host Jacob McConville, president of the Runnymede Society’s student chapter at McGill University. For further reading, take a look at their joint paper, “The Frontiers of Nullification and Anticommandeering: Federalism and Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation.”

Thank you for listening to Runnymede Radio! Tim Haggstrom, the host of Runnymede Radio and the Runnymede Society’s National Director, has a special message for our listeners, reflecting on this past season’s episodes and discussing our idea for next season’s theme: self-censorship in Canadian law schools. Feel free to contact us and send your ideas for next season by emailing us at communications@runnymedesociety.ca.

Can administrative decisions be shielded from judicial scrutiny by section 33 of the Charter?  Professor Andy Yu from Western University discusses his forthcoming paper on whether legislators can pass on to administrative bodies the immunity afforded by the notwithstanding clause.